Ppc for law firms: Legal Advertising Rules

Every row is a verbatim sentence read from the named source's own page through the estate's fetch service on the date shown, hash-pinned to the stored read (the sha of the page's visible text; the raw page is mirrored to R2).

2 of the 15 named sources that could be read published a usable figure; 13 published none and are recorded as not published, never filled in; 10 could not be read (blocked, dead or unreachable) and count nowhere.

The headline figures (median, minimum, maximum, quartiles) are over ONE figure per source in GBP (a source's median where its page yielded several accepted sentences), so N counts sources, never sentences; 2 candidate sentence(s) were refused by a reviewer with the reason recorded.

Derivation as chartered: one row per regulator per rule: what must be published, what may not be said, and what the statute prohibits outright - quoted verbatim from the authority with its effective date - plus the live enforcement record (the ASA's rulings against named firms, the SRA's warnings and fixed penalties) counted over time.

The derivation nobody has is the CROSS-REGULATOR one: the same firm marketing the same service is bound by a different transparency rule depending on which of five regulators authorises it, and a lead-generation payment that is ordinary marketing in one practice area is a criminal-adjacent breach under LASPO s.56 in another. changed-since on every rule, because a rate year here is a rule change.

2 candidate sentences on these pages were refused by a reviewer; each refusal and its reason is recorded in the review ledger.